Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 196 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$93.25 vs CA$158.27
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$0.51 vs CA$0.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2322 minutes ago
Buy for CA$158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |