Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-7350K - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |