Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-7300 - 177 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |