Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$138.88 vs CA$153.88
- Up to 7% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.56 vs CA$0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-6100 - 256 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
249
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13581 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
256
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |