Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$138.88 vs CA$156.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-10105 - CA$2.53 vs CA$2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Core i3-6100 - 60 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14140 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
60
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.62/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$156.99
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$156.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |