Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$69.99 vs CA$988.79
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$0.44 vs CA$6.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-6100 - 159 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.22/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$988.79
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$988.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |