Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$59.99 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-6100 - 483 vs 479 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76374 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
483
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
93.72056514913658%
Multi-Core
2336
31.338878454521062%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |