Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$140.0 vs CA$743.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 32% better in Valorant than Core i3-6100 - 994 vs 753 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
753
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10305 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
994
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$743.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$743.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |