Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2772 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 45% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-540 - 332 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |