Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 457 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-5015U - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$210.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5015U | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |