Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$85.99 vs CA$157.24
- Up to 44% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10400F - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4370 - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
138
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6785 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |