Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Athlon 200GE - 183 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$78.5 vs CA$157.24
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-10400F - CA$0.5 vs CA$0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12710 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
158
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |