Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 595 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 29% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1620 - 115 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - CA$36.89 vs CA$85.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-4370 - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.75 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
115
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |