Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1116 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 214 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 32 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
213
99.53271028037383%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
95.98360655737706%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |