Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1464 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-760 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
116
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |