Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$78.88 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 40% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.31 vs CA$0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4130 - 266 vs 253 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
253
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10246 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |