Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 30% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$78.88 vs CA$112.98
- Up to 28% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G6900 - CA$0.47 vs CA$0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-4130 - 173 vs 168 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
168
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13073 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
173
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
72%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |