Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3399 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-390M - 112 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |