Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3399 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-390M - 188 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |