Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2221 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$39.99 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3220 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76023 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
41.208791208791204%
Multi-Core
1085
14.555943117789106%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |