Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$69.88 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 19% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3220 - 169 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
142
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12713 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$290
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |