Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2586 days newer than Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Core i3-2120T - 56 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
33.202511773940344%
Multi-Core
816
10.94714247383955%
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |