Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 206 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$189.0 vs CA$350.71
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - CA$0.92 vs CA$1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for CA$350.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |