Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3381 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - 218 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$119.0 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - CA$0.55 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18622 minutes ago
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |