Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$99.99 vs CA$132.31
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10300 - CA$0.49 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105F - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
76%
Price, CA$
CA$132.31
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$132.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |