Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Core i3-9100F - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$138.88 vs CA$149.99
- Up to 1% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-10300 - CA$0.78 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$149.99
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15263 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |