Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-9590 - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$79.99 vs CA$340.0
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |