Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$44.99 vs CA$675.98
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G4900 - 221 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75671 minutes ago
Buy for CA$675.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.15023474178404%
Multi-Core
1051
12.480703004393776%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |