Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 897 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3930T - 71 vs 70 FPS
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
95.13888888888889%
Multi-Core
948
96.63608562691131%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |