Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 1917 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3930T - 123 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$125.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
36.92722371967655%
Multi-Core
948
20.1616333475117%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |