Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 405 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3930 - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
