Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1253 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 224 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
