Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G3930 - 303 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 64 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
