Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 454 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
88.62815884476535%
Multi-Core
825
72.55936675461741%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
