Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i3-3240 - 181 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
57.88923719958202%
Multi-Core
1137
57.56962025316456%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
