Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 173 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1820 - 61 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
61
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
90.25735294117648%
Multi-Core
825
38.00092123445417%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |