Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1767 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 346 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
346
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
38.54003139717426%
Multi-Core
825
11.067883015830427%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |