Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 28% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 177 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
30.93797276853253%
Multi-Core
723
15.412492005968875%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |