Buy on Amazon
CA$130
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4560 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610T - 157 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 3.5GHz Kaby Lake CPU LGA1151 Desktop Smart Cache Boxed
Buy for CA$130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
