Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 32% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1610T - 54 vs 41 FPS
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
54
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |