Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2865 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron 847 - 178 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$497.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$497.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13838 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |