Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1213 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 3865U - 543 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
543
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$218.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$218.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |