Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 3865U - 192 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
392
18.738049713193117%
Multi-Core
692
7.991684952072988%
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |