Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 1736 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron 3205U - 157 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |