Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 1000M - 209 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |