Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3292 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron 1000M - 454 vs 363 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |