Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1649 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 1000M - 181 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$87.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
27.07383773928897%
Multi-Core
511
16.186252771618626%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |