Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$210.00 vs CA$743.19
- Up to 63% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$1.45 vs CA$3.91 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8370 - 190 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
145
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.91/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$743.19
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$743.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7157 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |