Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2702 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8370 - 454 vs 373 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$109.00 vs CA$210.00
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield IV than FX-8370 - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7115 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |