Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3415 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$210.00 vs CA$470.92
- Up to 43% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.57 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Ready or Not than FX-8370 - 300 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 28 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
236
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7141 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
300
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$470.92
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$470.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7141 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |