Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - CA$160.47 vs CA$388.98
- Up to 51% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 7 8700G - CA$0.99 vs CA$2.01 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 20% better in God of War than FX-8150 - 194 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1917 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$388.98
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1917 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |